Review: Mercedes SLK 350

71

By Colin Mather

Too small and uncomfortable..  That more or less sums up what I think of the Mercedes SLK 350.  

I have always enjoyed Mercedes cars and my SLK experiences started with a 2002 SLK 320 Manual. It was bright red and my, so called, friends refered to it as a "hairdressers" car!  

Looks aside, it was not a bad car, the gearbox was a bit notchy and the suspension was not very sporty but on the whole I quite liked it.  So when I first took delivery of my SLK 350 auto with the F1 style front end and the more powerful engine I was excited, I like to drive fairly quickly and I enjoy driving for drivings sake.   The new car looked better than the old model and the interior felt more up todate. 

My first drive of the 350 was quite interesting. As I pulled away, with far too much throttle, the rear wheels snatched at the tarmac for grip and the car snaked it's way up the road. My first impression was positive, I like a lively drive and this certainly felt quite lively.  But my initial impression did not last for very long.  I discovered that if I drove the car with too much vigour that the gearbox would soon start to mess about, it would refuse to change up and hold the car in a gear for far too long.  On one occasion I arrived at a t-junction which was on a fairly steep incline; the car would not move! it just sat there with it's engine revving away.  After what felt like an age a gear was found with a bang and away we went.  

I continued my drive in a far more sedate manner and the car behaved as it should, but this experience had tainted my view and I was never particularly happy with the car's performance. 

Another problem with the SLK 350 Auto is one of having a very slow gearbox when it comes to selecting reverse gear after drive.  If you are driving along a busy high street and spot a parking space you pull up just past the gap and select R on the auto box and then wait.......it feels as though it's going to take forever. The only thing I will say about this is that it's a problem with ALL modern Mercedes auto's and the SLK is not alone.

The Interior cabin of SLK is quite well appointed, if a little on the small side.  There is a distinct lack of accessible storage and trying to find find somewhere to put your house keys, mobile phone and pack of gum is quite a challenge. 

The folding roof is quite superb and should be a standard feature on all cars.  The only small problem is the amount of luggage space space left when the roof is folded down.

The cars perfomance on a nice wide open, smooth, bump free road is very good. The car accelerates well and stops well.  The engine feels a little harsh when being driven in anything other than a docile way and I have already given my opinion of the gearbox.

The car's suspension is very hard and is set up in such a way that hard driving into corners will produce a little initial understeer followed by very controllable oversteer.  The suspension is, in my opinion, just too hard for everyday use.

In conclusion, The Mercedes SLK 350 is not my type of car.  It's not an exceiting drive in the sense that a Caterham or a TVR is exciting and it's not comfortable like some of it's bigger brothers.  I think this car is targeted at the 50+ female driver who does not want to drive quickly and is more interested in the look rather than build quality and performance.


Comments

SLK Driver 2 years ago

I think that you must have had a problem g/box. Mine changes just fine and the car is comfortable and rewarding to drive. It combines performance with style. TVR's may be exciting, but they are crude and unforgiving if you get it wrong. No comparison IMO.

Colin Mather profile image

Colin Mather Hub Author 2 years ago

Whilst I respect your opinion I must agree to disagree.. I have driven Mercedes Cars for many years and the latest SLK350 was one of my more disapointing purchases. I feel that the Porsche Boxter offers far more by way of a driving experience.

David 2 years ago

Have you tried the 6 speed manual version? If so, how does it compare?

ADEMOLA 2 years ago

I quite agree that the Mercedes SLK 350 is just anothet fuck up by mercedes. I have for 7yrs now driven a mercedes, ranging from 300Ce, S500 coupe, SLK 230 to the latest SLK 350. I once had to change the gearbox of my previuos SLK 230 because of the problems, but it never ended.

I just bought a new 350SLK a couple of years ago and today I discovered that the gearbox is ruined. I like to drive fast and I thought with a car like the 350slk, performance comes with style. But no, I was wrong! With my experience mercedes has got a huge problem with the gearbox of ALL their modern cars, ranging from electronic to gearbox.

My impression is that mercedes only makes their car for the look in todays modern world and not the quality.They used to be the best car around, but not anymore. I have a 12year old nissan and honestly speaking I have never had any problem with the car apart from the usuals.

Mike 4 weeks ago

Seriously, drive Mercs for 7 years with all those problems...*cough*bullshit*cough*...

No one in his right mind would purchase another car of the same brand with so many issues. Case in point I bought one POS Landrover Disco, it is the worst car Ive ever owned and guess what...I'll never buy another Landrover, ever again. Conversely my SLK350 has given me nothing but pleasure. The reviewer appears to like go-carts and you...well you're just an idiot IMHO

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working